Argument in the World of Work collide
Argument, let alone in the world of work, not uncommon to make people allergic.
Tuti Indra Fauziansyah, psychologist and career consultant from Iradat Consulting believes, arguing it was important to the world of work. As important as what and how that argument is not a debate without a result?
In the world of careers is known proverb Achieve more team work. Which means, by working together will give better results. Of course in working together that involve more than one person. Then the argument would become unavoidable.
If in one team there is only one argument or one way of thinking, this condition was not favorable. According to Tuti, which appears is groupthink. The new groupthink okay if the same end in mind, different if the mind will be removed. In the end it will kill creativity groupthink.
In fact, when creativity dies, a person's performance - which also affect the work his team - will run in place. For example, you are so lazy thinking to make a project better.
Tuti Indra Fauziansyah, psychologist and career consultant from Iradat Consulting believes, arguing it was important to the world of work. As important as what and how that argument is not a debate without a result?
In the world of careers is known proverb Achieve more team work. Which means, by working together will give better results. Of course in working together that involve more than one person. Then the argument would become unavoidable.
If in one team there is only one argument or one way of thinking, this condition was not favorable. According to Tuti, which appears is groupthink. The new groupthink okay if the same end in mind, different if the mind will be removed. In the end it will kill creativity groupthink.
In fact, when creativity dies, a person's performance - which also affect the work his team - will run in place. For example, you are so lazy thinking to make a project better.
One of the current weakness argue is the solution. In order for your team's arguments are not in vain, at least there are three things to note.
First, it should be emphasized in advance what the purpose of that argument. With the same purpose, direction and course of the argument will clear the argument would be efficient, directed, and do not argue with each other that are not necessarily him.
Second, consider the strengths of each. For example, the sales division you have to find a strategy for next year. A researcher sales certainly have strong data, while your friends are good at the facts to calculate increases and decreases in price, and you may be skilled in doing ana ¬ lysis of the facts that exist.
Third, before the argument, each head has been filled. Either form of statistical data, facts, or predictions of the future. But, according to Tuti, not always won the argument that it must be based on existing facts.
Categories:
Career
Artikel Terkait
0 comments:
Post a Comment